Copying Text

"To steal a book is an elegant offense" so goes an old Chinese saying. Is there any difference therefore, between downloading an MP3 of Lady Gaga and procuring a digital copy of an Economics textbook (16th edition, revised monthly)?

Well, I leave the ethical/moral discussions of such scenarios to those who have time (and of course, the money) but for me I began thinking about it a little further when I was browsing through Kakutani's top 10 books of 2010 and downloaded almost all the books listed within minutes. Such a thing is most interesting for e-books because only a few years ago (by that I mean pre-Kindle days, or the year 2006) such a feat would be impossible. E-book proliferation (and by extension, piracy) has indeed come a long way.

To be frank, I've downloaded my fair share of books (and movies and music, but mostly books). I realized such a collection would have cost an enormous amount of money had I legally purchased all of them (then again, I would not have purchased them in the first place). One thing's for sure - I got one heck of an education that most people who chose to go a "legal" route would've only dreamed about.*

Now here's another good question for the armchair ethicists (aren't we all!) out there - should such education be withheld from the common folk simply because of financial (and copyright and whatever) considerations? On one hand, I think content creators should be paid for their efforts. On another, the educational benefits of unleashing all that text and making them available to the masses for little to no cost may almost certainly outweigh all other considerations. Here's one to think about.

______________________________________________________

* But of course, if you have a great library in your town (and could borrow most of their books there), then you could also have a similar education for free.**

**This does not apply if you live in Malaysia.

23/11/2010

Five years later, my college education draws to a close. I have learnt many things and as it so happens most of those things aren't remotely related to my degree. I now know that it is better to wait than pick a course for the sake of picking one. I was told when we began that this was for those who were unsure.

I was unsure, initially. A few years in however, I began to be quite sure. But it was too late. Do I regret? Well, not really. I've probably spent more time studying other things that what I was supposed to study in my course. I grown rather cynical of institutionalized education and at the same time still wish to study in a decent university.

Well, being trained in business, I still have no business plans of my own. I only have what I call "projects" - highly expensive with an unknown return on investment. But it would still be fun to try.

Predators

Missed it in the cinemas so finally just got around to watch it. Firstly, to comment on the first two Predator films (AvP doesn't count). The first will always be a B-classic and by virtue of being well, the first, will be considered the best. The second transposed the setting from a natural to a concrete jungle with abysmal results.

Predators relies heavily on the first - from the setting, the music to scenes that are directly lifted (actually, homaged) from the first. The characters are much more interesting and diverse. I never thought Adrian Brody could pull off the strong, silent soldier type (to think that he is practically filling the shoes of Schwarzenegger) but he does it surprisingly well. Laurence Fishburne has an all too short but decent appearance.

So yes, it is one of the best movies in the franchise but at the same time it is still part of a franchise. Old tropes are recycled and it's quite clear who will live and who will die. At the same time, the first hour or so of the film is effectively tense and entertaining. The film also touches on slightly deeper themes, an allegory (if you wish to take such liberties) on the violent man.

One of the more entertaining films of the year, I'd say.

Part 5 - Man

They say that a man can never understand a woman.

Judging from history, I don't it's gender related.

We never understood each - other man or woman.

Meanwhile I always wonder why some people take their work so seriously.

Sure, it's what you do to survive (Really? I could probably survive without having to sit on a desk in front of an LCD monitor. But I admit it would be a rather spartan existence) but when someone took out her frustration on me I was not angry. I was amused rather.

Lady, you're taking your job way too seriously.

Part 4 - God

Do you believe in God?

If you do, why do you believe in God?

Give three reasons:
1.
2.
3.

Since you were unable to give any reason why you believe in God, do you think you should still believe in God?